Comparison
Snak Integral vs Aimitos pimenton
Overall, Snak Integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Snak Integral | Aimitos pimenton |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 502 kcal | 504 kcal |
| Fat | 25.1 g | 25.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 9.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Snak Integral has 20% less salt (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Snak Integral has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Snak Integral
Not available.
Aimitos pimenton
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Snak Integral or Aimitos pimenton?
Overall, Snak Integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Snak Integral has fewer calories: 502 kcal versus 504 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Snak Integral has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.