Comparison
Barritas de pan con chocolate vs Snak Integral
Overall, Snak Integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Barritas de pan con chocolat... | Snak Integral |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 497 kcal | 502 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 25.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 9.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Snak Integral has 52% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 4.6 g).
- Snak Integral has 87% less sugar (1.6 g vs 12 g).
- Barritas de pan con chocolate has 60% less salt (0.8 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Barritas de pan con chocolate
Not available.
Snak Integral
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Barritas de pan con chocolate or Snak Integral?
Overall, Snak Integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Barritas de pan con chocolate has fewer calories: 497 kcal versus 502 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Snak Integral has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 12 g per 100 g.