Comparison

Smoked Sausages Spicy Honey vs Broger Kalbsbra wurst

Overall, Broger Kalbsbra wurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSmoked Sausages Spicy HoneyBroger Kalbsbra wurst
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 536 kcal 231 kcal
Fat — 19 g
Saturated fat 17.9 g 3 g
Sugars 25 g 0.6 g
Salt 3.4 g 2.2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 28.6 g 13.5 g
Additives20
AllergensBeef, Celery, PorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Broger Kalbsbra wurst has 57% fewer calories (231 kcal vs 536 kcal).
  • Broger Kalbsbra wurst has 83% less saturated fat (3 g vs 17.9 g).
  • Broger Kalbsbra wurst has 98% less sugar (0.6 g vs 25 g).
  • Broger Kalbsbra wurst has 35% less salt (2.2 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Smoked Sausages Spicy Honey has 53% more protein (28.6 g vs 13.5 g).
  • Broger Kalbsbra wurst has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Smoked Sausages Spicy Honey lists: Beef, Celery, Pork.

Ingredients

Smoked Sausages Spicy Honey

Beef, pork, pork broth, honey, brown sugar, chili peppers, salt, flavorings, cultured celery powder, steviol glycosides, casings (colored with caramel and carmine).

Broger Kalbsbra wurst

Schweinefleisch 59%, Kalbsfleisch 17% , Trinkwasser, unjodiertes Speisesalz, Stärke, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, natürliches Aroma, Zucker, Stabilisator: Di - Tri - und Polyphosphate, Schweinedarm essbare Hülle

FAQ

Which is healthier: Smoked Sausages Spicy Honey or Broger Kalbsbra wurst?

Overall, Broger Kalbsbra wurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Broger Kalbsbra wurst has fewer calories: 231 kcal versus 536 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Broger Kalbsbra wurst has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 25 g per 100 g.

More comparisons