Skyr Nature vs Brasse coco nature
Overall, Skyr Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skyr Nature | Brasse coco nature |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skyr Nature has 24% fewer calories (52 kcal vs 69 kcal).
- Skyr Nature has no fat, while Brasse coco nature has 4.1 g.
- Skyr Nature has no saturated fat, while Brasse coco nature has 3.4 g.
- Brasse coco nature has no sugar, while Skyr Nature has 3.7 g.
- Skyr Nature has 94% more protein (8.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Skyr Nature has the better Nutri-Score.
- Skyr Nature is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Skyr Nature lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Skyr Nature
Lait écrémé pasteurisé (Origine : France), ferments lactiques (dont lait). Contient plus de 85% d'humidité.
Brasse coco nature
Eau, lait de coco 38%, amidon modifié, sel, ferments, protéines de pois
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skyr Nature or Brasse coco nature?
Overall, Skyr Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skyr Nature has fewer calories: 52 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brasse coco nature has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.