Comparison
Brasse coco nature vs Capuccino café
Overall, Brasse coco nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brasse coco nature | Capuccino café |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 69 kcal | 226 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 9.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 7.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 4.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brasse coco nature has 70% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 226 kcal).
- Brasse coco nature has 57% less fat (4.1 g vs 9.6 g).
- Brasse coco nature has 53% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 7.3 g).
- Brasse coco nature has no sugar, while Capuccino café has 21 g.
- Capuccino café has 100% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0 g).
- Capuccino café has 88% more protein (4.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Brasse coco nature has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Brasse coco nature
Eau, lait de coco 38%, amidon modifié, sel, ferments, protéines de pois
Capuccino café
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brasse coco nature or Capuccino café?
Overall, Brasse coco nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brasse coco nature has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 226 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brasse coco nature has less sugar: 0 g versus 21 g per 100 g.