Comparison

Skyr framboise vs Skyr sur lit auw fruits rouges

Overall, Skyr framboise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSkyr framboiseSkyr sur lit auw fruits roug...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 59 kcal 76 kcal
Fat 1.9 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 0.1 g
Sugars 8.4 g 11.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.9 g 0 g
Protein 8.9 g 7.8 g
Additives02
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Skyr framboise has 23% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 76 kcal).
  • Skyr sur lit auw fruits rouges has 74% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Skyr sur lit auw fruits rouges has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Skyr framboise has 28% less sugar (8.4 g vs 11.7 g).
  • Skyr framboise has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
  • Skyr framboise has 12% more protein (8.9 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Skyr framboise is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Skyr framboise

_lait_ pasteurisé 86% (matières grasses de lait 2.2%), framboises 6.4%, sucre de canne 5.1%, jus de citron concentré, amidon, ferments lactiques (_lait_)

Skyr sur lit auw fruits rouges

Yaourt maigre (Lait) - Sucre 8,3% - Fruits rouges 6,4% (Fraise 3,2% - Cerise griotte 1,9% - Framboise 1,3%)-Jus de carotte à base de concentré - Amidon de maïs - Epaississants: Carraghénanes, Gomme guar - Jus de citron à base de concentré - Arôme naturel - Concentré des minéraux du lait. Lait d'origine France.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Skyr framboise or Skyr sur lit auw fruits rouges?

Overall, Skyr framboise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Skyr framboise has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Skyr framboise has less sugar: 8.4 g versus 11.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons