Comparison

Skaldyrsdressing vs Chermuola 180g

Overall, Skaldyrsdressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSkaldyrsdressingChermuola 180g
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 236 kcal 526 kcal
Fat 20 g 56 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 6.8 g
Sugars 12 g 0.9 g
Salt 1.4 g 3.5 g
Protein 0.8 g 2.1 g
Additives70
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Skaldyrsdressing has 55% fewer calories (236 kcal vs 526 kcal).
  • Skaldyrsdressing has 64% less fat (20 g vs 56 g).
  • Skaldyrsdressing has 78% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Chermuola 180g has 93% less sugar (0.9 g vs 12 g).
  • Skaldyrsdressing has 60% less salt (1.4 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Chermuola 180g has 62% more protein (2.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Skaldyrsdressing has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Chermuola 180g is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Skaldyrsdressing

Tomatpuré, vand, rapsolie, eddike, sukker, glucose - fructosesirup, pasteuriserede ægge - blommer, modificeret stivelse, krydderier (inde - holder sennep), løgeks - trakt, salt, naturlig aroma, emulgatorer (E412, E415), surhedsregulerende midler (E270, E330), konserverings - midler (E202, E211), antioxidant (E385).

Chermuola 180g

huile de tournesol, Persil, coriandre, jus de citron, sel, Piment, essence-de-citron, Cumin, ac.citrique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Skaldyrsdressing or Chermuola 180g?

Overall, Skaldyrsdressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Skaldyrsdressing has fewer calories: 236 kcal versus 526 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chermuola 180g has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons