Comparison

Sirop de cassis sans sucres vs Sirop de Cassis de Bourgogne

Overall, Sirop de cassis sans sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientSirop de cassis sans sucresSirop de Cassis de Bourgogne
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 16 kcal 41 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 1 g 9.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives60
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sirop de cassis sans sucres has 61% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 41 kcal).
  • Sirop de cassis sans sucres has 90% less sugar (1 g vs 9.7 g).

Ingredients

Sirop de cassis sans sucres

Ingrédients Eau, jus de cassis à base de concentré 15% agent de charge: polydextrose, arôme naturel de cassis avec autres arômes naturels, acidifiant: acide citrique, épaississant: gomme xanthane, édulcorants : sucralose, acésulfame de potassium, conservateur: sorbate de potassium.

Sirop de Cassis de Bourgogne

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sirop de cassis sans sucres or Sirop de Cassis de Bourgogne?

Overall, Sirop de cassis sans sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sirop de cassis sans sucres has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sirop de cassis sans sucres has less sugar: 1 g versus 9.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons