Comparison

Organic blackcurrant cordial vs Sirop de cassis sans sucres

Overall, Sirop de cassis sans sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientOrganic blackcurrant cordialSirop de cassis sans sucres
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 31 kcal 16 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 7.5 g 1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0.1 g 0 g
Additives26
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sirop de cassis sans sucres has 48% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 31 kcal).
  • Sirop de cassis sans sucres has 87% less sugar (1 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Organic blackcurrant cordial is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Organic blackcurrant cordial

67% šťáva z černého rybízu, cukr, pitná voda, antioxidanty: kyselina L-askorbová, kyselina citronová. ' z ekologického zemědělství.

Sirop de cassis sans sucres

Ingrédients Eau, jus de cassis à base de concentré 15% agent de charge: polydextrose, arôme naturel de cassis avec autres arômes naturels, acidifiant: acide citrique, épaississant: gomme xanthane, édulcorants : sucralose, acésulfame de potassium, conservateur: sorbate de potassium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Organic blackcurrant cordial or Sirop de cassis sans sucres?

Overall, Sirop de cassis sans sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sirop de cassis sans sucres has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sirop de cassis sans sucres has less sugar: 1 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons