Schwip Schwap Zero Orange vs Paulaner Spezi
Overall, Schwip Schwap Zero Orange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schwip Schwap Zero Orange | Paulaner Spezi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 9.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 6 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schwip Schwap Zero Orange has 97% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Schwip Schwap Zero Orange has 98% less sugar (0.2 g vs 9.2 g).
- Schwip Schwap Zero Orange has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Schwip Schwap Zero Orange
Wasser, Orangensaftkonzentrat, Kohlensäure, Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure, Orangenextrakt, Süßungsmittel Aspartam³ und Acesulfam K 25 Aroma, Antioxidationsmittel Ascorbinsäure, Säureregulator Natriumcitrate, Stabilisator E 414, Farbstoffe Beta-Carotin und E 160e. Enthält eine Phenylalaninquelle
Paulaner Spezi
Wasser, Zucker, Orangensaft aus Orangensaftkonzentrat, Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Kohlensäure, Orangenextrakt, Farbstoff E150d, Säuerungsmittel Phosphorsäure und Zitronensäure, Säureregulator Natriumcitrat, natürliches Aroma, koffeinhaltiges Aroma, Antioxidationsmittel Ascorbinsäure, Stabilisator Johannisbrotkernmehl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schwip Schwap Zero Orange or Paulaner Spezi?
Overall, Schwip Schwap Zero Orange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schwip Schwap Zero Orange has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schwip Schwap Zero Orange has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.