Comparison

Schokolierte Himbeeren in Zartbitterschokolade vs Gevriesdroogde fruitmix

Overall, Gevriesdroogde fruitmix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSchokolierte Himbeeren in Za...Gevriesdroogde fruitmix
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 529 kcal 380 kcal
Fat 36 g 2 g
Saturated fat 21 g 0.3 g
Sugars 37 g 52 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 11 g 15 g
Protein 6.2 g 8 g
Additives10
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gevriesdroogde fruitmix has 28% fewer calories (380 kcal vs 529 kcal).
  • Gevriesdroogde fruitmix has 94% less fat (2 g vs 36 g).
  • Gevriesdroogde fruitmix has 99% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 21 g).
  • Schokolierte Himbeeren in Zartbitterschokolade has 29% less sugar (37 g vs 52 g).
  • Gevriesdroogde fruitmix has 27% more fiber (15 g vs 11 g).
  • Gevriesdroogde fruitmix has 22% more protein (8 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Gevriesdroogde fruitmix has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Schokolierte Himbeeren in Zartbitterschokolade lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Schokolierte Himbeeren in Zartbitterschokolade

92% Zartbitterschokolade* (Kakaomasse*, Rohrzucker* Kakaobutter*, stark entöltes Kakaopulver*, Emulgator: SOJALECITHINE*), 7% Himbeeren*, Überzugsmittel: Gummi arabicum*; Zucker*, Dextrose*

Gevriesdroogde fruitmix

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Schokolierte Himbeeren in Zartbitterschokolade or Gevriesdroogde fruitmix?

Overall, Gevriesdroogde fruitmix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gevriesdroogde fruitmix has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 529 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Schokolierte Himbeeren in Zartbitterschokolade has less sugar: 37 g versus 52 g per 100 g.

More comparisons