Comparison
Schafskäse vs Feta
Overall, Feta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schafskäse | Feta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 272 kcal | 276 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 16.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 16.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Feta has 21% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.8 g).
Ingredients
Schafskäse
pasteurisierte Schafmilch, Salzlake.
Feta
lait de brebis (70% min) et de chèvre (30% max) pasteurisés, sel, cultures bactériennes, présure microbienne,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schafskäse or Feta?
Overall, Feta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schafskäse has fewer calories: 272 kcal versus 276 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Feta has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.