Saveur Poulet Rôti vs Tortillas chili
Overall, Tortillas chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saveur Poulet Rôti | Tortillas chili |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 532 kcal | 482 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tortillas chili has 25% less fat (21 g vs 28 g).
- Tortillas chili has 50% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3.4 g).
- Tortillas chili has 54% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Tortillas chili has the better Nutri-Score.
- Tortillas chili is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Saveur Poulet Rôti lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Saveur Poulet Rôti
Pommes de terre,huiles végétales (tournesol, colza, maïs en proportion variable),base aromatisante poulet rôti [poudre de levure, oignon en poudre, ail en poudre, extrait de levure, arômes, chlorure de potassium, sauge, colorant (extrait de paprika), antioxydant (extrait de romarin],sel
Tortillas chili
Farine de maïs* 74,5%, huile de tournesol*, assaisonnement au chili* 4% (sel, poivrons rouges* 0,6%, ail*, oignons*, sucre*, coriandre*, piment* 0,04%, fénugrec*, livèche*). *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique. Traces éventuelles de SOJA.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saveur Poulet Rôti or Tortillas chili?
Overall, Tortillas chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tortillas chili has fewer calories: 482 kcal versus 532 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tortillas chili has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.