Comparison

Saucisson Sec aux Noix vs Bâton de Berger Mini Noix (environ 8 Bâtonnets)

Overall, Saucisson Sec aux Noix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaucisson Sec aux NoixBâton de Berger Mini Noix (e...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 408 kcal 536 kcal
Fat 33 g 45.8 g
Saturated fat 11 g 18.3 g
Sugars 2 g 3.1 g
Salt 4.4 g 4.2 g
Protein 24.5 g 27 g
Additives23
AllergensMilkMilk, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saucisson Sec aux Noix has 24% fewer calories (408 kcal vs 536 kcal).
  • Saucisson Sec aux Noix has 28% less fat (33 g vs 45.8 g).
  • Saucisson Sec aux Noix has 40% less saturated fat (11 g vs 18.3 g).
  • Saucisson Sec aux Noix has 35% less sugar (2 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Only Bâton de Berger Mini Noix (environ 8 Bâtonnets) lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Saucisson Sec aux Noix

Viande de porc, LACTOSE, sel saccharose, dextrose, épices et aromates, conservateurs: nitrate de potassium - nitrite de sodium, ferments.

Bâton de Berger Mini Noix (environ 8 Bâtonnets)

Viande de porc (origine: UE), NOIX (15%), sel, LACTOSE, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, ferments, Enveloppe : alginate de sodium, cellulose ou collagène cellulose, 150 g de viande utilisés pour la préparation de 100 g de produit fini, Présence possible d?autre fruits à coques,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saucisson Sec aux Noix or Bâton de Berger Mini Noix (environ 8 Bâtonnets)?

Overall, Saucisson Sec aux Noix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saucisson Sec aux Noix has fewer calories: 408 kcal versus 536 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saucisson Sec aux Noix has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons