Comparison

Saucisson sec artisanal au Roquefort vs Saucisson pur porc de Camapgne

Overall, Saucisson pur porc de Camapgne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaucisson sec artisanal au R...Saucisson pur porc de Camapg...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 401 kcal 398 kcal
Fat 32 g 32.1 g
Saturated fat 13 g 4.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2 g
Salt 4.6 g 2.7 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 27 g 25.4 g
Additives12
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saucisson pur porc de Camapgne has 64% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 13 g).
  • Saucisson sec artisanal au Roquefort has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Saucisson pur porc de Camapgne has 41% less salt (2.7 g vs 4.6 g).

Ingredients

Saucisson sec artisanal au Roquefort

Viande de porc, ROQUEFORT (LAIT) 2,5%, sel, LACTOSE, vin, dextrose, épice, plante aromatique. Conservateur: nitrate de potassium. Ferments lactiques Boyau naturel de porc.

Saucisson pur porc de Camapgne

Etiquette recto: maigre et gras de porc frais (146 g de viande utilisée pour 100 g de produit fini), sel, sucre (lactose, dextrose), assaisonnement, ferments, Conservateur: nitrate de potassium. - Étiquette verso: maigre et gras de porc, assaisonnement (sel, lactose, sirop de glucose, épices, plantes aromatiques, dextrose, E252, E316).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saucisson sec artisanal au Roquefort or Saucisson pur porc de Camapgne?

Overall, Saucisson pur porc de Camapgne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saucisson pur porc de Camapgne has fewer calories: 398 kcal versus 401 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saucisson sec artisanal au Roquefort has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons