Saucisses au chou vs Saucisse de savoie
Overall, Saucisses au chou has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisses au chou | Saucisse de savoie |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 118 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisses au chou has 57% fewer calories (118 kcal vs 273 kcal).
- Saucisses au chou has 65% less fat (8.5 g vs 24 g).
- Saucisses au chou has 64% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 9 g).
- Saucisse de savoie has 47% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Saucisses au chou has 69% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.4 g).
- Saucisse de savoie has 42% more protein (11 g vs 6.4 g).
- Saucisses au chou has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Saucisses au chou
Saucisses 30 % (viande de porc, plasma de porc, eau, sel, gras de porc, épices, arôme naturel d'ail, boyau naturel de porc), chou blanc 24,1%, eau, carottes 12%, pommes de terre 10,6 % (pommes de terre, antioxydant: acide ascorbique, conservateur: disulfite de sodium), cidre breton IGP, amidon, sel. Traces éventuelles de gluten, oeuf, poisson, soja, lait, fruits à coque, moutarde, mollusques, céleri.
Saucisse de savoie
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisses au chou or Saucisse de savoie?
Overall, Saucisses au chou has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisses au chou has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisse de savoie has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.