Sauce aperitif echalote et ciboulette vs Ail et wasabi
Overall, Ail et wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sauce aperitif echalote et ciboulette
Ail et wasabi
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sauce aperitif echalote et c... | Ail et wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 462 kcal | 297 kcal |
| Fat | 48.5 g | 28.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 11.9 g | 4.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | Eggs, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ail et wasabi has 36% fewer calories (297 kcal vs 462 kcal).
- Ail et wasabi has 41% less fat (28.4 g vs 48.5 g).
- Ail et wasabi has 66% less saturated fat (4.1 g vs 11.9 g).
- Ail et wasabi has 46% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Ail et wasabi has 49% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0.3 g).
- Ail et wasabi has 60% more protein (3.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Ail et wasabi has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ail et wasabi lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Sauce aperitif echalote et ciboulette
Huile de tournesol, lait, échalote 9,8%, vinaigre d'alcool, ciboulette 2,5%, sucre, jaune d'oeuf, sel, gommes de xanthane et de guar, jus concentré de citron.
Ail et wasabi
Lait, huile de tournesol, fromage blanc (lait), ail 10%, jaune d'oeuf, wasabi 4%, échalote, eau, sel, persil, jus concentré de citron, gommes de xanthane et de guar.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sauce aperitif echalote et ciboulette or Ail et wasabi?
Overall, Ail et wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ail et wasabi has fewer calories: 297 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ail et wasabi has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.