Comparison

Satisbite white chocolate coffee lover vs Protein Riegel Erdnuss Geschmack

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSatisbite white chocolate co...Protein Riegel Erdnuss Gesch...
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 392 kcal 409 kcal
Fat 19 g 16 g
Saturated fat 10.6 g 9.2 g
Sugars 3.4 g 23 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.4 g
Fiber 5.2 g 0.3 g
Protein 29 g 30 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedMilk, Soybeans, Milcheiweiß, Vollmilchpulver, Vollmilchschokolade

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Protein Riegel Erdnuss Geschmack has 16% less fat (16 g vs 19 g).
  • Protein Riegel Erdnuss Geschmack has 13% less saturated fat (9.2 g vs 10.6 g).
  • Satisbite white chocolate coffee lover has 85% less sugar (3.4 g vs 23 g).
  • Satisbite white chocolate coffee lover has 94% more fiber (5.2 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Only Protein Riegel Erdnuss Geschmack lists: Milk, Soybeans, Milcheiweiß, Vollmilchpulver, Vollmilchschokolade.

Ingredients

Satisbite white chocolate coffee lover

Not available.

Protein Riegel Erdnuss Geschmack

Milcheiweiß, Vollmilchschokolade (22 %) (Zucker, Vollmilchpulver, Kakaobutter', Kakaomasse, Emulgator Lecithine (Soja), Vanille-Extrakt), Glukosesirup, Fruktosesirup, Feuchthaltemittel Glycerin, Palmfett, natürliches Erdnuss Aroma, Speisesalz. 'Rainforest Alliance-zertifiziert Kakao: 30%

FAQ

Which is healthier: Satisbite white chocolate coffee lover or Protein Riegel Erdnuss Geschmack?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Satisbite white chocolate coffee lover has fewer calories: 392 kcal versus 409 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Satisbite white chocolate coffee lover has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 23 g per 100 g.

More comparisons