Comparison

Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und vs Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso

Overall, Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalchicha KOLLER de res x4un...Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico,...
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — —
Calories 205 kcal 46 kcal
Fat 15 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat 6.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.9 g 0.6 g
Fiber 2.1 g 0.3 g
Protein 14 g 7.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso has 78% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 205 kcal).
  • Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso has 94% less fat (0.9 g vs 15 g).
  • Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso has 68% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und has 86% more fiber (2.1 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und has 45% more protein (14 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und

Not available.

Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und or Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso?

Overall, Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salchicha Pomona Cilindrico, Liso has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons