Comparison

Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und vs Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda

Overall, Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalchicha KOLLER de res x4un...Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tip...
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — —
Calories 205 kcal 47 kcal
Fat 15 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 6.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.9 g 0.3 g
Fiber 2.1 g —
Protein 14 g 6.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda has 77% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 205 kcal).
  • Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda has 96% less fat (0.6 g vs 15 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda has 97% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda has 84% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und has 54% more protein (14 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und

Not available.

Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und or Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda?

Overall, Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pechuga de pavo DELIPAVO tipo pastrami porcionado tienda has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salchicha KOLLER de res x4und has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons