Comparison

Salchicha KOLLER chipolata vs Tocineta KOLLER

Overall, Salchicha KOLLER chipolata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalchicha KOLLER chipolataTocineta KOLLER
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — —
Calories 228 kcal 287 kcal
Fat 15 g 25 g
Saturated fat 8.8 g 10 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0 g
Salt 52.5 g 1.2 g
Fiber 3.4 g 0 g
Protein 21 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salchicha KOLLER chipolata has 21% fewer calories (228 kcal vs 287 kcal).
  • Salchicha KOLLER chipolata has 40% less fat (15 g vs 25 g).
  • Salchicha KOLLER chipolata has 12% less saturated fat (8.8 g vs 10 g).
  • Tocineta KOLLER has no sugar, while Salchicha KOLLER chipolata has 0.6 g.
  • Tocineta KOLLER has 98% less salt (1.2 g vs 52.5 g).
  • Salchicha KOLLER chipolata has 100% more fiber (3.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Salchicha KOLLER chipolata has 29% more protein (21 g vs 15 g).
  • Tocineta KOLLER has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Salchicha KOLLER chipolata

Not available.

Tocineta KOLLER

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salchicha KOLLER chipolata or Tocineta KOLLER?

Overall, Salchicha KOLLER chipolata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salchicha KOLLER chipolata has fewer calories: 228 kcal versus 287 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tocineta KOLLER has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons