Comparison
Salade prête à consommer Iceberg vs Cœur de Laitue
Overall, Salade prête à consommer Iceberg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salade prête à consommer Ice... | Cœur de Laitue |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cœur de Laitue has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Salade prête à consommer Iceberg has 60% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
- Salade prête à consommer Iceberg has 28% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Only Cœur de Laitue lists: None.
Ingredients
Salade prête à consommer Iceberg
Laitue Iceberg.
Cœur de Laitue
Laitue.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salade prête à consommer Iceberg or Cœur de Laitue?
Overall, Salade prête à consommer Iceberg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salade prête à consommer Iceberg has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salade prête à consommer Iceberg has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Salade prête à consommer... vs Coeur de Laitue 200g
Cœur de Laitue vs Laitue Iceberg 175g
Salade prête à consommer... vs Laitue Iceberg 175g
Coeurs de laitue vs Cœur de Laitue
Laitue iceberg vs Cœur de Laitue
Laitue iceberg vs Salade prête à consommer...
Cœur de Laitue vs Coeur de Laitue 200g
Cœur de Laitue vs Coeurs de laitue