Comparison
Salade mesclun vs Ekologisk småbladsmix
Overall, Ekologisk småbladsmix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salade mesclun | Ekologisk småbladsmix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salade mesclun has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ekologisk småbladsmix has 78% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Ekologisk småbladsmix has 38% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Salade mesclun
Not available.
Ekologisk småbladsmix
Rucola* 30%, röd babybatavia* 25%, grön babybatavia* 25%, babyspenat* 20%. *Ekologisk
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salade mesclun or Ekologisk småbladsmix?
Overall, Ekologisk småbladsmix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salade mesclun has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekologisk småbladsmix has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.