Comparison
Mesclun vs Ekologisk småbladsmix
Overall, Mesclun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mesclun | Ekologisk småbladsmix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mesclun has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Mesclun has no saturated fat, while Ekologisk småbladsmix has 0.5 g.
- Mesclun has no sugar, while Ekologisk småbladsmix has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Mesclun
Not available.
Ekologisk småbladsmix
Rucola* 30%, röd babybatavia* 25%, grön babybatavia* 25%, babyspenat* 20%. *Ekologisk
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mesclun or Ekologisk småbladsmix?
Overall, Mesclun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekologisk småbladsmix has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mesclun has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.