Comparison
Mesclun vs Mesclun
Overall, Mesclun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mesclun | Mesclun |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 10 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | — |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mesclun has 55% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 22 kcal).
- Mesclun has no sugar, while Mesclun has 0.5 g.
- Mesclun has 52% more protein (2.3 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Mesclun
Not available.
Mesclun
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mesclun or Mesclun?
Overall, Mesclun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mesclun has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mesclun has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.