Comparison
Safranfäden vs Zafferano
Overall, Zafferano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Safranfäden | Zafferano |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 42.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | — |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zafferano has no calories, while Safranfäden has 352 kcal.
- Zafferano has no fat, while Safranfäden has 5.9 g.
- Zafferano has no saturated fat, while Safranfäden has 1.6 g.
- Zafferano has no sugar, while Safranfäden has 42.4 g.
- Safranfäden has 100% more fiber (3.9 g vs 0 g).
- Safranfäden has 100% more protein (11.4 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Safranfäden
Safran
Zafferano
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Safranfäden or Zafferano?
Overall, Zafferano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zafferano has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zafferano has less sugar: 0 g versus 42.4 g per 100 g.