Rubicon Mango vs Still mango
Overall, Still mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Rubicon Mango | Still mango |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 16 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Still mango has no fat, while Rubicon Mango has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Rubicon Mango
water, mango puree (16%), sugar, Gructise, Acid (citric acid), stabilisers (guar gum, xanthan gum), flavourings, vitamin C, seeetners (sucralose, acesulfame k)
Still mango
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rubicon Mango or Still mango?
Overall, Still mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rubicon Mango has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 16 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rubicon Mango has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.