Rubicon Mango vs Nectar De Mango
Overall, Rubicon Mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Rubicon Mango | Nectar De Mango |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 16 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 12.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rubicon Mango has 70% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 53 kcal).
- Nectar De Mango has no fat, while Rubicon Mango has 0.5 g.
- Rubicon Mango has 73% less sugar (3.4 g vs 12.5 g).
- Rubicon Mango has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Rubicon Mango
water, mango puree (16%), sugar, Gructise, Acid (citric acid), stabilisers (guar gum, xanthan gum), flavourings, vitamin C, seeetners (sucralose, acesulfame k)
Nectar De Mango
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rubicon Mango or Nectar De Mango?
Overall, Rubicon Mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rubicon Mango has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rubicon Mango has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 12.5 g per 100 g.