Comparison
Royal Gala Apples vs Gala apples
Overall, Gala apples has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Royal Gala Apples | Gala apples |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 11.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Apple |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gala apples has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Gala apples has 28% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Only Gala apples lists: Apple.
Ingredients
Royal Gala Apples
Gala apples
Gala apples
Apples.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Royal Gala Apples or Gala apples?
Overall, Gala apples has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gala apples has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Royal Gala Apples has less sugar: 11 g versus 11.8 g per 100 g.