Rote Linsen, getrocknet vs Rote Linsen
Overall, Rote Linsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rote Linsen, getrocknet | Rote Linsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 344 kcal | 320 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | — |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 13 g | 21.8 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 25.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rote Linsen, getrocknet has 40% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Rote Linsen has 40% more fiber (21.8 g vs 13 g).
- Rote Linsen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rote Linsen, getrocknet
99,75% Bio Rote Linsen, Bio Sonnenblumenöl.
Rote Linsen
Lentille corail'. Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique. Traces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten, de soja, de graines de sésame, de moutarde et de lupin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rote Linsen, getrocknet or Rote Linsen?
Overall, Rote Linsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rote Linsen has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rote Linsen, getrocknet has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.