Root beer amber bottles sprechen sie deutsch wisconsin vs Zero Sugar Root Beer
Overall, Zero Sugar Root Beer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Root beer amber bottles sprechen sie deutsch wisconsin
Zero Sugar Root Beer
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Root beer amber bottles spre... | Zero Sugar Root Beer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 260 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 51 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zero Sugar Root Beer has no calories, while Root beer amber bottles sprechen sie deutsch wisconsin has 260 kcal.
- Zero Sugar Root Beer has no sugar, while Root beer amber bottles sprechen sie deutsch wisconsin has 51 g.
- Zero Sugar Root Beer has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Root beer amber bottles sprechen sie deutsch wisconsin
Carbonated water, glucose syrup, maltodextrin, raw honey, natural & artificial flavors, sodium benzoate (as a preservative) phosphoric acid, quillaia/yucca extract, sodium chloride, natural caramel color
Zero Sugar Root Beer
Carbonated water, caramel color, sodium benzoate (preservative), aspartame, acesulfame potassium, natural and artificial flavors, malic acid, quillaia extract.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Root beer amber bottles sprechen sie deutsch wisconsin or Zero Sugar Root Beer?
Overall, Zero Sugar Root Beer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zero Sugar Root Beer has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zero Sugar Root Beer has less sugar: 0 g versus 51 g per 100 g.