Comparison
Romarin vs Romarin
Overall, Romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Romarin | Romarin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 242 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 15.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 7.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 42.6 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Romarin has no calories, while Romarin has 242 kcal.
- Romarin has no fat, while Romarin has 15.2 g.
- Romarin has no saturated fat, while Romarin has 7.4 g.
- Romarin has 100% more protein (4.9 g vs 0 g).
- Romarin has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Romarin
Not available.
Romarin
Romarin 100%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Romarin or Romarin?
Overall, Romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Romarin has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 242 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Romarin has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.