Comparison
Romarin vs Romarin ciselé
Overall, Romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Romarin | Romarin ciselé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 178 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 9.4 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Romarin has no calories, while Romarin ciselé has 178 kcal.
- Romarin has no fat, while Romarin ciselé has 12 g.
- Romarin has no saturated fat, while Romarin ciselé has 3.4 g.
- Romarin has no salt, while Romarin ciselé has 9.4 g.
- Romarin ciselé has 100% more protein (4.4 g vs 0 g).
- Romarin has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Romarin
Not available.
Romarin ciselé
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Romarin or Romarin ciselé?
Overall, Romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Romarin has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Romarin has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.