Comparison
Riz Semi-complet vs Long grain incollable
Overall, Long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Semi-complet | Long grain incollable |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Long grain incollable has 63% less fat (1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Long grain incollable has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Long grain incollable has 60% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Riz Semi-complet has 65% more fiber (3.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Riz Semi-complet has 16% more protein (8.9 g vs 7.5 g).
Ingredients
Riz Semi-complet
Riz semi-complet
Long grain incollable
10 LONG GRAIN INCOLLABLE
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Semi-complet or Long grain incollable?
Overall, Long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz Semi-complet has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Long grain incollable has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1 g per 100 g.