Comparison
Riz rond pour dessert vs Arroz redondo
Overall, Riz rond pour dessert has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz rond pour dessert | Arroz redondo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 347 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz rond pour dessert has no saturated fat, while Arroz redondo has 0.3 g.
- Riz rond pour dessert has 11% more protein (7.5 g vs 6.7 g).
Ingredients
Riz rond pour dessert
Riz rond de qualité supérieure
Arroz redondo
Arroz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz rond pour dessert or Arroz redondo?
Overall, Riz rond pour dessert has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arroz redondo has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz rond pour dessert has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Arroz redondo vs Arroz Redondo
Riz rond pour dessert vs Arroz Redondo
Riz Spécial Dessert vs Arroz redondo
Riz Spécial Dessert vs Riz rond pour dessert
Arroz redondo vs Arroz SOS Integral
Riz rond pour dessert vs Arroz SOS Integral
Taureau aile risotto kil... vs Arroz redondo
Arroz redondo vs Arroz redondo J Sendra