Comparison

Riz long semi-complet étuvé 10 minutes paquet de 500g vs IGP Riz de Camargue Semi complet

Overall, Riz long semi-complet étuvé 10 minutes paquet de 500g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz long semi-complet étuvé...IGP Riz de Camargue Semi com...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — 1
Calories 358 kcal 347 kcal
Fat 3.2 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.8 g 1.9 g
Protein 9 g 8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • IGP Riz de Camargue Semi complet has 38% less fat (2 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Riz long semi-complet étuvé 10 minutes paquet de 500g has no sugar, while IGP Riz de Camargue Semi complet has 0.5 g.
  • Riz long semi-complet étuvé 10 minutes paquet de 500g has 32% more fiber (2.8 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Riz long semi-complet étuvé 10 minutes paquet de 500g has 11% more protein (9 g vs 8 g).

Ingredients

Riz long semi-complet étuvé 10 minutes paquet de 500g

Riz long semi-complet etuve de qualite superieure issu de l'agriculture biologique. traces eventuelles de soja et de cereales contenant du gluten. contaminations croisees : gluten et soja.riz origine europe.

IGP Riz de Camargue Semi complet

Riz long semi-complet

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz long semi-complet étuvé 10 minutes paquet de 500g or IGP Riz de Camargue Semi complet?

Overall, Riz long semi-complet étuvé 10 minutes paquet de 500g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

IGP Riz de Camargue Semi complet has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riz long semi-complet étuvé 10 minutes paquet de 500g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons