Comparison
Riz Long Grain vs Riz Thai
Overall, Riz Thai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Long Grain | Riz Thai |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz Thai has 27% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
- Riz Long Grain has 55% more fiber (2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Riz Thai has 14% more protein (8.1 g vs 7 g).
Ingredients
Riz Long Grain
Riz long grain étuvé de qualité supérieure.
Riz Thai
Riz long
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Long Grain or Riz Thai?
Overall, Riz Thai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz Long Grain has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz Long Grain has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.