Comparison

Riz long grain vs Long grain incollable

Overall, Long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz long grainLong grain incollable
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 134 kcal 356 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.7 g 1.3 g
Protein 2.7 g 7.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riz long grain has 62% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 356 kcal).
  • Long grain incollable has 46% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Long grain incollable has 64% more protein (7.5 g vs 2.7 g).

Ingredients

Riz long grain

Riz long grain.

Long grain incollable

10 LONG GRAIN INCOLLABLE

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz long grain or Long grain incollable?

Overall, Long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riz long grain has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Long grain incollable has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons