Riz long grain vs Long grain incollable
Overall, Long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz long grain | Long grain incollable |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 134 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz long grain has 62% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 356 kcal).
- Long grain incollable has 46% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Long grain incollable has 64% more protein (7.5 g vs 2.7 g).
Ingredients
Riz long grain
Riz long grain.
Long grain incollable
10 LONG GRAIN INCOLLABLE
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz long grain or Long grain incollable?
Overall, Long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz long grain has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Long grain incollable has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.