Comparison

Riz au lait de coco vs Riso vegan waniliowe

Overall, Riso vegan waniliowe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz au lait de cocoRiso vegan waniliowe
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 142 kcal 110 kcal
Fat 8.2 g 4.1 g
Saturated fat 7.8 g 3.8 g
Sugars 10.9 g 8.4 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber 3.1 g 1.6 g
Protein 1.2 g 1.1 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riso vegan waniliowe has 23% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 142 kcal).
  • Riso vegan waniliowe has 50% less fat (4.1 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Riso vegan waniliowe has 51% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Riso vegan waniliowe has 23% less sugar (8.4 g vs 10.9 g).
  • Riz au lait de coco has 49% more fiber (3.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Riz au lait de coco is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Riz au lait de coco

Lait de coco équitable 46,8%*, eau, riz rond de Camargue 8,6%*, sucre de canne équitable*, amidon de riz*. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Riso vegan waniliowe

Woda, 17 % ekstrakt z kokosa, 8% ryż, cukier, syrop ryżowy, mąka ryżowa, skrobia, roślinny koncenrat barwiacy (z marchwi), substancje zagęszczające: guma guar, mączka chleba świętojańskiego, karagen; stabilizator:chlorek wapnia, 0,3% naturalny aromat waniliowy, sól, błonnik cytrusowy, wyekstrahowane nasiona wanilli, aromat.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz au lait de coco or Riso vegan waniliowe?

Overall, Riso vegan waniliowe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riso vegan waniliowe has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riso vegan waniliowe has less sugar: 8.4 g versus 10.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons