Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto vs Risotto aux cèpes et poulet
Overall, Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto
Risotto aux cèpes et poulet
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Risotto au poulet et cèpes c... | Risotto aux cèpes et poulet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 156 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 9.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 6.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto has 38% less fat (5.9 g vs 9.5 g).
- Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto has 41% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 6.3 g).
- Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto has 18% more protein (7.3 g vs 6 g).
- Only Risotto aux cèpes et poulet lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto
Not available.
Risotto aux cèpes et poulet
Riz cuit 26%, CREME 18%, viande de poulet 17% (origine France), cèpe 13%, champignon de Paris 11%, oignon, BEURRE, ail, sel, persil, arôme naturel, farine de tapioca, huile de tournesol, thym, paprika, poivre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto or Risotto aux cèpes et poulet?
Overall, Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 156 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Risotto au poulet et cèpes champignon risotto has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.