Comparison

Riso vialone nano vs Presidio Slow Food RISO DI GRUMOLO DELLE ABBADESSE

Overall, Riso vialone nano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiso vialone nanoPresidio Slow Food RISO DI G...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 348 kcal 345 kcal
Fat 0.4 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1.1 g 2.3 g
Protein 7.1 g 7.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riso vialone nano has 60% less fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Riso vialone nano has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Riso vialone nano has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Presidio Slow Food RISO DI GRUMOLO DELLE ABBADESSE has 54% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Riso vialone nano has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Riso vialone nano

Riso

Presidio Slow Food RISO DI GRUMOLO DELLE ABBADESSE

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riso vialone nano or Presidio Slow Food RISO DI GRUMOLO DELLE ABBADESSE?

Overall, Riso vialone nano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Presidio Slow Food RISO DI GRUMOLO DELLE ABBADESSE has fewer calories: 345 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riso vialone nano has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons