Comparison
Riso vialone nano vs Riso vialone nano
Overall, Riso vialone nano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riso vialone nano | Riso vialone nano |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 348 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 78 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riso vialone nano has 91% more protein (78 g vs 7.1 g).
Ingredients
Riso vialone nano
Not available.
Riso vialone nano
Riso
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riso vialone nano or Riso vialone nano?
Overall, Riso vialone nano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riso vialone nano has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riso vialone nano has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.