Rioja grand reserve vs Piemonte Grignolino
Overall, Piemonte Grignolino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Rioja grand reserve | Piemonte Grignolino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 80 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Protein | — | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piemonte Grignolino has no calories, while Rioja grand reserve has 80 kcal.
- Only Piemonte Grignolino lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Rioja grand reserve
Not available.
Piemonte Grignolino
Uva. Agenti stabilizzanti (acido citrico monoidrato, mannoproteine del lievito, poliaspartato di potassio). Contiene Solfiti
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rioja grand reserve or Piemonte Grignolino?
Overall, Piemonte Grignolino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Piemonte Grignolino has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 80 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Piemonte Grignolino has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.