Rigatoni N°35 vs RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51
Overall, Rigatoni N°35 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rigatoni N°35 | RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rigatoni N°35 has 38% less fat (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rigatoni N°35 has no saturated fat, while RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51 has 0.3 g.
- Only RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51 lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Rigatoni N°35
Semoule de BLÉ dur de qualité supérieure. Peut contenir du SOJA et de la MOUTARDE
RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51
Semoule de blé dur de qualité supérieure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rigatoni N°35 or RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51?
Overall, Rigatoni N°35 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rigatoni N°35 has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rigatoni N°35 has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.