Comparison

Rigatoni N°35 vs RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51

Overall, Rigatoni N°35 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRigatoni N°35RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 351 kcal 356 kcal
Fat 1 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 3 g 3.1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3 g 2.9 g
Protein 14 g 14.5 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rigatoni N°35 has 38% less fat (1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Rigatoni N°35 has no saturated fat, while RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51 has 0.3 g.
  • Only RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51 lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Rigatoni N°35

Semoule de BLÉ dur de qualité supérieure. Peut contenir du SOJA et de la MOUTARDE

RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51

Semoule de blé dur de qualité supérieure.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rigatoni N°35 or RUMMO Mezzi Rigatoni No 51?

Overall, Rigatoni N°35 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rigatoni N°35 has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rigatoni N°35 has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons