Comparison
Rigatoni N°35 vs Rigatoni n°24
Overall, Rigatoni N°35 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rigatoni N°35 | Rigatoni n°24 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rigatoni N°35 has 33% less fat (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Rigatoni N°35 has no saturated fat, while Rigatoni n°24 has 0.3 g.
- Rigatoni N°35 has 12% less sugar (3 g vs 3.4 g).
- Only Rigatoni N°35 lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Rigatoni N°35
Semoule de BLÉ dur de qualité supérieure. Peut contenir du SOJA et de la MOUTARDE
Rigatoni n°24
TEIGWAREN AUS HARTWEIZENGRIEß
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rigatoni N°35 or Rigatoni n°24?
Overall, Rigatoni N°35 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rigatoni N°35 has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rigatoni N°35 has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.