Comparison
Riesling Trocken vs Pinot Grigio
Overall, Pinot Grigio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riesling Trocken | Pinot Grigio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 6 kcal | 5 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinot Grigio has 33% less sugar (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Only Riesling Trocken lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Riesling Trocken
Not available.
Pinot Grigio
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riesling Trocken or Pinot Grigio?
Overall, Pinot Grigio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinot Grigio has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 6 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pinot Grigio has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.