Ricola aux plantes des alpes suisses vs Ricola fleurs de sureau
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricola aux plantes des alpes... | Ricola fleurs de sureau |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 392 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Ricola aux plantes des alpes suisses
Édulcorant (isomalt), huile essentielle de menthe, huile essentielle de eucalyptus, extrait d'eucalyptus (0,2%), extrait de plantes, menthol, extrait de spiruline, extrait de carotte, édulcorant glycosides de stéviol (Stevia)
Ricola fleurs de sureau
Isomalt, acidifiant (acide malique), extraits (0,6%) de fleurs de sureau et du mélange de 13 plantes Ricola, concentré de jus de citron, édulcorants (sucralose, acésulfame-K), arômes naturels, menthol, concentré-couleur (patate douce, carotte),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricola aux plantes des alpes suisses or Ricola fleurs de sureau?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricola fleurs de sureau has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricola aux plantes des alpes suisses has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.