Comparison
RichesMonts vs Raclette
Overall, RichesMonts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | RichesMonts | Raclette |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 328 kcal | 375 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- RichesMonts has 13% fewer calories (328 kcal vs 375 kcal).
- RichesMonts has 13% less fat (26 g vs 30 g).
- RichesMonts has 14% less saturated fat (18 g vs 21 g).
- RichesMonts has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- RichesMonts has 15% less salt (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Only Raclette lists: Milk.
Ingredients
RichesMonts
Not available.
Raclette
Lait cru de vache écrémé, sel iodé, ferments lactiques, presure microbienne, conservateur (croute): natamycine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: RichesMonts or Raclette?
Overall, RichesMonts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
RichesMonts has fewer calories: 328 kcal versus 375 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
RichesMonts has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.