RichesMonts vs La Raclette
Overall, RichesMonts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | RichesMonts | La Raclette |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 328 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- RichesMonts has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only La Raclette lists: Milk.
Ingredients
RichesMonts
Not available.
La Raclette
Lait pasteurisé de vache (origine France), sel, ferments lactiques, coagulant microbien, conservateur (croûte) : natamycine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: RichesMonts or La Raclette?
Overall, RichesMonts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
RichesMonts has fewer calories: 328 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
RichesMonts has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.