Comparison
Rhubarbe vs Cardons nature bocal 720
Overall, Rhubarbe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rhubarbe | Cardons nature bocal 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 16 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | — |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cardons nature bocal 720 has 78% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Cardons nature bocal 720 has no sugar, while Rhubarbe has 1.5 g.
- Rhubarbe has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Rhubarbe has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rhubarbe
Not available.
Cardons nature bocal 720
0,76g l,03g seau, sel etaq
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rhubarbe or Cardons nature bocal 720?
Overall, Rhubarbe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rhubarbe has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cardons nature bocal 720 has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.